United And Liverpool Lack London Postcode To Get apos;prices They Floated apos;: Difference between revisions

From My wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Former Liverpool chairman Sir Martin Broughton has questioned the valuations that the owners of the Reds and Manchester United have placed on their clubs. <br>Broughton believes that the two clubs will struggle to get the asking prices of over £4billion given that they are not in London. <br>The businessman insisted that  have property interests in London, and [https://evigetir.com/evden-eve-google.html EvDEN EvE NAKliyAt] would therefore be more  in the capital, rather than moving their 'pads' to the North West.<br> <br> Sportsmail  that expect to make an offer for  [http://terratraffic.com/buyers-are-rushing-to-resale-websites-to-snatch-up-25/ eVdEn eve nAkliyAt] United, and it was <br>Broughton was part of an ultimately failed bid to takeover Chelsea last year, and claimed that it was this experience that highlighted how potential billionaire investors would prefer a club located in the capital. <br>        Sir Martin Broughton believes Manchester United and Liverpool will struggle to receive bids close to their asking prices as they lack London postcodes<br>        United's owners Joel (L) and Avram (R) Glazer are seeking north of £6bn to sell th, who have set a mid-February deadline for any bid to be received. <br>Liverpool's Fenway Sports Group (FSG) owners, however, have set no deadline and are not thought to have set any timeframe to sell, [https://evigetir.com/evdeneve/index.html EVDEn Eve NakliYAT] and Broughton suggested the Reds might be better off looking for multiple investors.<br>        A group of private, high-wealth individuals based in the oil-rich state, buoyed by Qatar's hosting of the World Cup, have set their sights on a club they view as ‘football's crown jewels'<br>        The Qataris face a significant rival in Sir Jim Ratcliffe - who is the richest man in Britain<br>'Liverpool will be best off taking in co-investors to ensure the current owners can work alongside them and be satisfied that these are the right people,' he added.<br>        Broughton was the chairman that sold Liverpool to FSG in 2010<br>'As I understand it,  [https://jarkormadriz.com/wiki/index.php?title=Usuario:KrisBirmingham1 eVDEn EVE naKliYat] they [FSG] are interested to see what the market reaction is. They could be willing sellers. They could be willing to have investors, but if they carry on owning it, that's fine too. If you treasured this [https://www.ourmidland.com/search/?action=search&firstRequest=1&searchindex=solr&query=article article] and you would like to acquire more info concerning [https://evigetir.com/evdeneve/montaj%20-%20Kopya.html EVDEN Eve nAKLiyAt] generously visit our website. That's my understanding of their position.'<br>Ratcliffe - a life-long United fan - is the only potential buyer to go public with their intentions to buy the Red Devils, and is thought to be the main rival to any bid from the group of investors from the oil-rich state.  <br>But Broughton suggested that prospective owners of the two clubs will come into very different situations. <br>For Liverpool, the ex-chairman believes any owner will find it hard to follow FSG, while a new United owner will 'have the following wind' behind them. <br>'They're (FSG) a difficult act to follow. To be a better owner than Fenway is quite difficult. At United, it's more like the old Liverpool situation. Fans will be so pleased. Whoever buys it will have the following wind.'<br>
Former Liverpool chairman Sir Martin Broughton has questioned the valuations that the owners of the Reds and Manchester United have placed on their clubs. <br>Broughton believes that the two clubs will struggle to get the asking prices of over £4billion given that they are not in London. <br>The businessman insisted that  have property interests in London, and would therefore be more  in the capital, rather than moving their 'pads' to the North West.<br> <br> Sportsmail  that expect to make an offer for  [https://evigetir.com/testt.html EVdEN eve nAKliyat] United, and it was <br>Broughton was part of an ultimately failed bid to takeover Chelsea last year, and claimed that it was this experience that highlighted how potential billionaire investors would prefer a club located in the capital. <br>        Sir Martin Broughton believes Manchester United and Liverpool will struggle to receive bids close to their asking prices as they lack London postcodes<br>        United's owners Joel (L) and Avram (R) Glazer are seeking north of £6bn to sell th, who have set a mid-February deadline for any bid to be received. <br>Liverpool's Fenway Sports Group (FSG) owners, however, have set no deadline and are not thought to have set any timeframe to sell, and Broughton suggested the Reds might be better off looking for multiple investors.<br>        A group of private, high-wealth individuals based in the oil-rich state, buoyed by Qatar's hosting of the World Cup, have set their sights on a club they view as ‘football's crown jewels'<br>        The Qataris face a significant rival in Sir Jim Ratcliffe - who is the richest man in Britain<br>'Liverpool will be best off taking in co-investors to ensure the current owners can work alongside them and be satisfied that these are the right people,' he added.<br>        [https://discover.hubpages.com/search?query=Broughton Broughton] was the chairman that sold Liverpool to FSG in 2010<br>'As I understand it,  [https://www.wikinawa.fr/Utilisateur:RolandoKoenig0 evdEn EVE nAkLiYAT] they [FSG] are interested to see what the market reaction is. They could be willing sellers. They could be willing to have investors, but if they carry on owning it,  [https://cgiwiki.net/index.php/Fears_Grow_For_American_Student_Who_Disappeared_Studying_In_France EVDen eVE nAKLiYAt] that's fine too. That's my understanding of their position.'<br>Ratcliffe - a life-long United fan - is the only potential buyer to go public with their intentions to buy the Red Devils, and is thought to be the main rival to any bid from the group of investors from the [https://www.business-opportunities.biz/?s=oil-rich oil-rich] state. In the event you loved this post as well as you desire to receive more info relating to [https://evigetir.com/evdeneve/filomuz.html eVdeN eVe NAkLiYAT] kindly check out the webpage.   <br>But Broughton suggested that prospective owners of the two clubs will come into very different situations. <br>For Liverpool, [https://evigetir.com/tips.html eVdeN eVE nAkliyat] the ex-chairman believes any owner will find it hard to follow FSG, while a new United owner will 'have the following wind' behind them. <br>'They're (FSG) a difficult act to follow. To be a better owner than Fenway is quite difficult. At United, it's more like the old Liverpool situation. Fans will be so pleased. Whoever buys it will have the following wind.'<br>

Revision as of 15:55, 20 May 2023

Former Liverpool chairman Sir Martin Broughton has questioned the valuations that the owners of the Reds and Manchester United have placed on their clubs. 
Broughton believes that the two clubs will struggle to get the asking prices of over £4billion given that they are not in London. 
The businessman insisted that have property interests in London, and would therefore be more in the capital, rather than moving their 'pads' to the North West.

Sportsmail  that expect to make an offer for EVdEN eve nAKliyat United, and it was
Broughton was part of an ultimately failed bid to takeover Chelsea last year, and claimed that it was this experience that highlighted how potential billionaire investors would prefer a club located in the capital. 
Sir Martin Broughton believes Manchester United and Liverpool will struggle to receive bids close to their asking prices as they lack London postcodes
United's owners Joel (L) and Avram (R) Glazer are seeking north of £6bn to sell th, who have set a mid-February deadline for any bid to be received. 
Liverpool's Fenway Sports Group (FSG) owners, however, have set no deadline and are not thought to have set any timeframe to sell, and Broughton suggested the Reds might be better off looking for multiple investors.
A group of private, high-wealth individuals based in the oil-rich state, buoyed by Qatar's hosting of the World Cup, have set their sights on a club they view as ‘football's crown jewels'
The Qataris face a significant rival in Sir Jim Ratcliffe - who is the richest man in Britain
'Liverpool will be best off taking in co-investors to ensure the current owners can work alongside them and be satisfied that these are the right people,' he added.
Broughton was the chairman that sold Liverpool to FSG in 2010
'As I understand it, evdEn EVE nAkLiYAT they [FSG] are interested to see what the market reaction is. They could be willing sellers. They could be willing to have investors, but if they carry on owning it, EVDen eVE nAKLiYAt that's fine too. That's my understanding of their position.'
Ratcliffe - a life-long United fan - is the only potential buyer to go public with their intentions to buy the Red Devils, and is thought to be the main rival to any bid from the group of investors from the oil-rich state. In the event you loved this post as well as you desire to receive more info relating to eVdeN eVe NAkLiYAT kindly check out the webpage.   
But Broughton suggested that prospective owners of the two clubs will come into very different situations. 
For Liverpool, eVdeN eVE nAkliyat the ex-chairman believes any owner will find it hard to follow FSG, while a new United owner will 'have the following wind' behind them. 
'They're (FSG) a difficult act to follow. To be a better owner than Fenway is quite difficult. At United, it's more like the old Liverpool situation. Fans will be so pleased. Whoever buys it will have the following wind.'